When I am cooking, you will notice that I do call for sugar in my recipes but understand that is for those whom are not diabetic and wishing to try the recipe. If you are diabetic then we both know that "sugar" is not going to be sugar.
Sugar is derived from various sources: sugar cane and sugar beets are the most common. It is bad for you whether you are diabetic or not. So, many substitutes were sought:
Aspartame ... aka NutraSweet aka Equal, is a chemical with a laundry list of what is wrong with it, but people buy it anyway. I would avoid this chemical at all times unless you like the idea of cancer, epileptic seizures and oh so much more attributed to it by doctors! It can even convert to alcohol when exposed to heat and a DUI is not really what you want in the middle of Nevada in summertime! (one of my friends!) For me, it gives me really bad headaches - so restricting blood flow to the old bean is not good. NOT recommended!Beech, Birch and Maple sugars are naturally occurring sweeteners made from evaporated tree saps. I grew up with them in northern Europe and they have subtle flavors all their own and work well for all forms of baking but for teas, coffee or lemonades - not a good choice in my book. Lemonade should not taste like pancakes.
Cyclamate - oh where to start! The oldest of all artificial sweeteners (1930's) it was banned in the US by the FDA due to a California study finding that it caused cancer in 8 out of 250 rats (1969?). It should be pointed out that a human would have to consume 350 cans of diet pop sweetened with cyclamates a day to match that study! I met one of the chemists from the California study decades after the ban and she admitted the study was bogus. But, in the US, the product remains banned. I would recommend against exposure to this chemical as one of my acquaintances, whom had drunk this heavily as a child, did die of bladder cancer 30 years later. So, caution ... NOT recommended!
Saccharine once banned because of its close tie-in with Cyclamates, was restored to the market some years ago. Good for baking, has a brown sugar equivalent offering as well, browns and acts just like sugar. I rarely use it and then only sparingly. Just not so comfortable with its safety. So, out for lunch I will grab the Sweet-n-Low pink packet (not all pink packets are Sweet-n-Low!) and then only use maybe a fourth of a packet in a 12 ounce mug of tea.
Splenda ... a chemical whose properties are completely misrepresented by its owners, to the extent of false advertising. Yes, your body does breakdown this chemical because:A) you can taste sweet, which is a chemical reaction;
B) I am violently allergic to it!
And it seems that there are many whom are as well. I was an early user of this product, importing it from Canada for several years. But, it does not bake well and in volume has an odd after-taste. NOT recommended!
Xylitol is another Mexican shrub whose leaf yields a very sweet taste. It is not widely cultivated and a little goes extremely a long way. I have yet to see this in much more than in gum or occasionally a candy. So, not available for baking but should it be, it will have the same problems as Stevia.
In my baking or cooking: Nutiva or very rarely sugar.
In small doses: Stevia or sugar in tea or on cereal.
Whatever your choices, keep those carbo load numbers down!


No comments:
Post a Comment